Home
Words of God
Author's Notes
   - Heavenly Signs
How it came about
 
Table of Contents
 
 
The Second Coming
   - Words of God
 

 
The Book of Rock
   - Good vs. Evil
 
The Book of Hope
   - A God's Eye View
  - Sheila G.
 

 
You Can Help:
    - PLANT SEEDS
    - Volunteers Needed
 
Reviews
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 

 


Plant
your seeds
on
good grounds now!

&
harvest
thousand fold over
on the earth
and in the eternity!

Click to
PLANT NOW!
Glory, Glory,
Hallelujah!

 

PROPHECY 
"The Prelude"
Back Next
 

 

10. The Supreme Court and New Campaign Laws

GOD:

I’m appalled with the American Supreme Court’s decision on campaign laws that consider corporations and unions as individuals allowing them or anyone with deep pockets to influence the outcome of any election in the village to benefit themselves regardless of their negative effect on the villagers as a whole. This decision is utterly wrong and unfair. How can a villager compete with corporations and unions with unlimited resources? Besides, the employees of corporations and unions are the villagers who already exercise the voting power as a “one man one vote” in order for democracy to work. Corporations and unions are not a “man.” The village has rules, and the laws must govern, protect, and preserve the “one man, one vote” right in favor of true democracy in the village. Any “non-man” added entities as the court hae determined corporations and unions are such, will upset the delicate balance of fairness as individual villagers can’t compete with the fortune of the 1% and to that fact with the corporations and unions.(1)

For example, a single wealthy man financed the entire campaign of one of the hopeful Republican presidential candidates by giving tens of millions of dollars. How can a single villager compete with that?(2)

Do you think that individual and the likes have no self-serving interest in spending their money on that candidate? Don’t you think that candidate will reciprocate in favor of that individual, his ideology, and/or interests? What does that leave the villagers, the democracy and their interests? How do you think they have arrived at these dire times? That is why it’s mighty important for true democracy and true capitalism to work for the benefit of all, the 1% and the 99%. There is nothing to be gained in a divided and lopsided democracy!

How could an average villager compete with just that one individual who took home over $5.5 billion last year alone? This ruling will further push the villagers into financial slavery and roll back the 200 years of their fragile democracy and bring back a darker time. Physical slavery and/or wage slavery has and will continue to erode honor and humanity in the village! The decay is the outcome of individual greed and lies that accompany them, leading to the loss of trust and their sense of community. Thus, and with the advancement of their technology, the villagers are reduced to just a number and no longer a human being as it was to become if I didn’t intervene, and the outcome of WWII was to be different.
 

JESUS:

It is unbelievable and heartbreaking, Holy Father!

Bringing about all of those miseries upon Your beloved children, despite the fact that Your Commandments delivered and preached to them by Me in My First Coming.

It is unbelievable, Holy Father!

 

   
----------------------------------------------------------------

(1)

Citizens United - The Court ruled in a five-to-four decision that the First Amendment prohibits the government from limiting spending for political purposes by corporations and unions and unions and effectively granted corporations and unions and unions the same free-speech rights enjoyed by individual citizens. The first decision legitimized Rove’s power during the two terms of George W. Bush. The second one allowed Rove to re-establish his power and gave a new life to his vision of creating a “permanent Republican majority.” Click here to read the Article’s link:

(2)

Letters to the Editor - As one of the more than 550,000 people who gave over $200 to Obama in 2008, and also one of the nearly 90% of those people who have not GIVEd that amount again in 2012, I would like to point out that the difference is not due to disappointment in Obama. It is due to the Citizens United ruling, which disqualified my $200 from playing in the big leagues. I like Obama, just as much as – or maybe even more than I did in ’08, and will vote for him again. But I’m going to keep my precious $200, because it wouldn’t even be a drop in the ocean compared with what the corporations can do. It’s like the nuclear-arms race: everyone has more than enough already, and the Republicans will always make sure that no one has more than their guy.  - P. G.,  Washington

Letters to the Editor - After reading the Article on Karl Rove, I realized that I am somewhat naďve. I never knew how much money it takes to buy an election or a candidate. With all of the economic problems in this country, it seems somewhat insulting to the working-class person that millions and millions of dollars are being directed toward candidates in order to give special privileges to the wealthy. Let’s be realistic: they don’t need more special privileges. The rich are doing just fine on their own. I’m not saying that they need to “give” their money to those who don’t have as much as they do, but wouldn’t it be better to invest in correcting the problems we have in this country? What exactly are the candidates selling and their donors buying with so many millions?  - C.N., New York

 

 

   

 

  Back Next

 

 

We protect your privacy and security. For more information, read our:
Plant Seeds   Community   Contact Us  |  Home
© 101012.org.  2023,  All rights reserved.
Your Privacy  |  Terms of Use  |  About Us